Corentin Moutet vs Clement Tabur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When it comes to second serve performance, Moutet shows better recent form, scoring 49.58% versus Tabur's 43.48%. Could this be a decisive factor in predicting the match outcome?
• In terms of winning points on opponents' second serves, Moutet edges out with 46.79%, compared to Tabur's 45.31%. This stat slightly leans in Moutet's favor.
• Both players have similar success rates in first serve returns with Moutet at 30.6% and Tabur at 30.17%, indicating a closely matched aspect of their game.
• The ability to save breakpoints is nearly identical, with Moutet saving 55.65% and Tabur saving 55.58%, suggesting no clear advantage here.
• Performance over the last year shows Tabur with a better winning percentage at 62.34% compared to Moutet’s 50%.
• Surface preferences reveal Moutet excels on Clay with a 64% win rate, while Tabur is strongest on Hard courts, boasting a 67% win rate.
• Considering their level of competition, Moutet has competed in higher-level tournaments (Masters series) and faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 78.94, compared to Tabur's Challenger/ITF circuits against lower-ranked players averaging 338.36.
• In deciding sets, Tabur shows a slight advantage, having won 56% of such matches versus Moutet's 50% win rate in similar scenarios.
• Breakpoint conversion is slightly in favor of Tabur, who converts 36.09% of opportunities, while Moutet converts 33.69%, providing a narrow edge for Tabur.

Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):

As we assess the performances and various aspects influencing the upcoming tennis match, several key statistics emerge as potential indicators of superiority.

Moutet's recent form shows competence in second serve performance and returned points on the opponent's second serve. These aspects, combined with competing against more challenging opponents, may give Moutet the resilience and experience advantage.

On the other hand, Tabur has been displaying a stronger overall match win percentage and performing better in breakpoint conversions and deciding sets, showcasing a competitive edge that should not be overlooked.

The contrasting tournament levels, along with surface specialties, add layers to this intriguing matchup. Considering these comparisons and performance patterns, Moutet appears to have a slight edge due to competitive experience with higher-ranked opponents.

While it is a closely matched contest, Moutet is slightly more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis encounter.